Episode 04: Nothing ships unchecked.

In This Episode

Reviewed in full.
Stamped at every step.

A reviewer commits to a full QA round, edits arrive as tracked changes, and versions move from draft to QA to published without leaving the platform.

A QA round starts with a recorded commitment to review every section and finding

Edits arrive as tracked changes for the author to accept or deny

Draft to QA to published, every step stamped with who and when

Findings never leave the platform: no third-party writing assistants on the way

View the PDF Talk to us

Start QA review dialog over a draft proposal: the reviewer confirms they will read every section and finding in full and see the review through to Return or Approve. — 01A QA round starts with a recorded commitment to review in full

Tracked changes view of a Project Introduction section: insertions and deletions marked inline, Accept or Deny controls, and a threaded comment with its status. — 02Edits arrive as tracked changes for the author to accept or deny

Published proposal v1.0 with the lifecycle bar showing In QA, Approved and Published, each stamped with a name, date and time. — 03Draft to QA to published, every step stamped with who and when

Editing a section inside Dispatch during QA: the platform's own editor with the note that saving proposes a tracked change for the author to review. — 04Written and reviewed inside the platform: nothing passes through a third-party tool

For MSPs and consultancies

Every report and proposal carries its own review history, so you can show a client exactly who checked their deliverable, and quality stays consistent across consultants.

For internal teams

Findings and assessments are reviewed and approved before they reach stakeholders, with a stamped trail you can point an auditor to.

Reviewed in full.Stamped at every step.

For MSPs and consultancies

For internal teams

Reviewed in full.
Stamped at every step.